Last Monday, we practiced how to
tailor learning objectives and then later on, an instructional design. It looks easy to do as I see the example in
the module but in reality, the thinking process is a long, hard work.
The first activity was writing a
concise objective. I thought it was easy because you only have to write the
condition, the learner, then the behavior and the verbs to be used are already
available from the module but those action words are not just synonyms. Instead,
they have a hierarchy of depending on appropriateness. The most difficult of
the domains for me was the affective domain. It looks like the cognitive domain
and it was hard to tell the difference that I had to fall in line over and over
again to ask questions from the instructors.
Then there was the instructional
design making. Without a proper objective, the instructional design will not be
written succinctly so the first activity had to be thorough to proceed with the
next step. Filling out the contents and
strategies were the hardest part for me because these required the bulk of the
thinking process that I had to eat chocolate to think properly. The draft was
unlimited. My hands were exhausted. My head was aching. Writing that
instructional design was something I will not forget.
And it is really important not to
forget in spite of my whining because a majestic palace would not be built without a
meticulous blueprint. Just like in the clinics, an effective therapy session would
be hard to achieve without a comprehensive instructional design.
No comments:
Post a Comment